Wednesday, August 23, 2023

Hitler and the Trinity - Table of Contents

Anti-trinitarianism in Nazi Germany in regards to the anti-trinitarian movements of Positive Christianity, Freemasonry, Theosophy and the Freemason-based cults of Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Christian Scientists, and Seventh Day Adventists (Seventh Day Adventist broke off and became trinitarian). One must deny the trinity to be a Noahide.  The question was was there any connection between the anti-trinitarian Nazi church of Positive Christianity and Noahidism.  Since the Nazis persecuted almost all anti-trinitarian religions and worked with the only trinitarian anti-Freemason church, Seventh Day Adventists, I conclude there was no Noahide motivation in Positive Christianity to deny the trinity. 

PLEASE SUPPORT ME 
https://www.patreon.com/VincentBruno 


All the below deny the trinity
except the Seventh Day Adventist Church


Positive Christianity under Hitler


Freemasons Under Hitler


Theosophy Under Hitler


Jehovah's Witnesses under Hitler


Christian Science under Hitler


Mormons under Hitler


Seventh Day Adventists under Hitler



Himmler wanted the Jehovah's Witness religion to become to the official religion of Russia after WWII





"He came to respect the Jehovah's Witnesses, tens of thousands of whom were imprisoned in his concentration camps as a result of their pacifist and anti-Nazi attitudes, because of their stubborn will to resist: 'If their fanaticism could be harnessed for Germany or a similar fanaticism be created in the nation as a whole in wartime, we would be stronger than we are today!' They also lived frugal lives and were hard-working and honest. For that reason he not only employed them in his own household and in those of friends and SS families," I but expressed the view that precisely these qualities should be propagated among the suppressed nations in the east, where in addition the Jehovah's Witnesses' pacifism was extremely welcome to the Germans! In July 1944, in a long letter, Himmler therefore ordered the then-head of the Reich Security Main Office. Dr Ernst Kaltenbrunner, to export the religion to the occupied eastern territories (which by this time were no longer occupied): 'In the case of all Turkish peoples the Buddhist faith is suitable but for other nations the teachings of the Bible Students [Jehovah's Witnesses] are the appropriate ones." - "Heinrich Himmler: A Life" By Peter Longerich, p. 267

Originally published in Russian at: http://www.k-istine.ru/sects/iegova_witness/iegova_witness_himmler-02.htm
We will get rid of the use of Communists by Jehovah's Witnesses

Letter from the Reichsführer SS Himmler, July 21, 1944. 
Reichsfuehrer SS 
RF / M 
Field command post, July 21, 1944 
Dear Kaltenbrunner! 
Many events and problems have recently led to the emergence of subsequent considerations and the following ideas. 
The problems are Jehovah's witnesses, the Cossack issue and the related Vlasov question, as well as the overall complex: how we want to rule Russia and maintain peace on its territory, when - which will undoubtedly happen in the next few years - we will again conquer large spaces and areas, owned. 
1) In my opinion, Stalin and his follower, if he will be a Bolshevik, will not depart from the collective farm system. In the opinion of the Reich Minister for Food and Agriculture Bakke, Stalin, even if he wants to back off, will not be able to do this for purely material reasons: due to a shortage of tractors, plows, harrows and draft animals. If Stalin and Bolshevism do not want to back away from the collective farm system, each independent peasant will by nature be his enemy. Reconciliation between them will not happen. 
2) Before the German East Wall, which we once build, we should, taking the examples of the military border of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Russian example of sedentary Cossacks and soldiers, arrange the eastern frontier of defense by the forces of the new Cossacks. The landed estates, a completely independent existence and freedom will, according to our code, be granted to the Ukrainian and Russian population only at the Cossack border. Here there will be full-fledged peasant estates with the condition of carrying from 16 to 60 years of life of the soldiers' service at the border, against attacks from the East. The fact of owning land, as well as constantly and continuously shedding blood on both sides, will breed enmity for years and decades without the chances of subsequent reconciliation. 
3) In the rear area, which will become a land for German settlers, we want to introduce land partnerships with small private estates, as we have done recently in Ukraine, as well as purely German settlements.The most active and active elements will be constantly self-destroying, as they will be dragged to the border, where we use them for the soldiers' service on our side. 
However, in order to achieve a peaceful and unarmed coexistence from the people in the rear, we must go further. Any idea of ​​introducing National Socialism there is insane. But people should have a religion or worldview. To maintain and revitalize the Orthodox Church is incorrect, since it will become a place for the organization of the national movement. It is at least as wrong to let the Catholic Church go there, and there's nothing to say about it. 
4) We must support any form or kind of religion or sect that would have a pacifying effect. For all the Turkic peoples, the introduction of the Buddhist teaching comes to mind here, for everyone else - the teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses. 
As you should know, Jehovah's Witnesses have the following extremely useful qualities for us: 
Except for military service and work for military purposes, i.е. use for, as they say "destructive" activities, Jehovah's Witnesses are extremely opposed to the Jews, against the Catholic Church and the Pope. They are incredibly sensible, do not drink or smoke, are extremely diligent and very honest, keep the word, are excellent cattle-breeders and peasants, are not fixated on wealth and prosperity, since it hinders eternal life. In general, these are all - ideal qualities. It can be concluded that the core of convinced, idealistic witnesses of Jehovah possesses enviable good qualities like Mennonites. 
5) For this reason, I would like Jehovah's Witnesses in our camps to be checked by special commissions to see if they are real Jehovah's witnesses. In order that those who just handed themselves for a Jehovah's Witness just before the arrest or already in the camp for practical reasons were excluded. Thus, we will get rid of the use of Jehovah's Witnesses by Communists and the dubious so-called Jehovah's Witnesses, whom I here and there met in farmsteads, for example, in Friedolfing (Upper Bavaria). There is, further, the possibility of using real 
Jehovah's Witnesses in concentration camps at all responsible posts related to monetary or other material matters, and especially good handling. Thanks to this, we will take the first step to engage the German Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia in the future and obtain emissaries who, by spreading the faith of Jehovah's Witnesses, will pacify the Russian people. 
Yours, H. Himmler 
BA NS19 / 1627, 
translation by Igor Petrov 
Translator's note. Himmler uses the term Bibelforscher - "Bible researchers", which is somewhat wider than the "Jehovah's Witnesses", but it is the latter

Tuesday, June 27, 2023

Mormons Under Hitler

   Table of Contents













Mormon Nazis by Mormon Heretic







[RECOMMENDED READING] The Hitler Dilemma: A Mormon Boy in the German Army

  Table of Contents


The Hitler Dilemma: A Mormon Boy in the German Army

Saarbrücken, Germany 1938

Change is in the air in Max Adams's small village: The censorship of classic literature, the math and science courses, the addition of extra physical education classes. Along with thousands of other young men, he is forced into the Hitler Youth and is being groomed to become the next generation of Nazi soldiers. But as a faithful Latter-day Saint, how can Max serve the villain who destroyed his younger brother in his effort to create a Master Race a man who is bent on tearing apart not only a single nation also the entire world?

From the horrors of battle and the sorrow of separation from family to the privations of a prisoner of war, Carolyn Twede Frank's groundbreaking novelThe Hitler Dilemmais a poignant chronicle of one remarkable young man's struggle to reconcile his sense of duty with his staunch opposition to the evil tyrant destroying the country he loves.

Mormon Nazi resister Helmuth Hubener on Mormon Wiki



 https://www.mormonwiki.com/Helmuth_Hubener

Helmuth Hubener

Helmuth Hubener, Latter-day Saint anti-Nazi hero (at center)

Helmuth Hübener was a teenaged anti-Nazi hero and a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. He was born January 8, 1925, in Hamburg, Germany. Helmuth's mother and grandparents were also members of the Church. His surname comes from his adoptive father. The family was not politically active.

Helmuth had been active in the Boy Scouts from a young age, but scouting was banned in Germany in 1935. He became a member of Hitler Youth until Kristalnacht, in which Hitler Youth participated. One of the leaders of Hübener's Mormon congregation, a new convert to the Church, sought to ban Jews from their meetings. There were about 2,000 members in the area, and only about 7 who were pro-Hitler. Five of those seven were in Hübener's congregation, causing much discussion among the members. Helmuth was one who opposed banning Jews and opposed Hitler.

In his teens, Helmuth began listening to BBC radio broadcasts (which was forbidden by the Nazis), and he determined that the British knew the truth about Hitler. He sought to spread the truth and reveal the evils of the Third Reich. He began to compose various anti-fascist texts and anti-war leaflets, of which he also made many copies. The pamphlets also predicted the war's futility and Germany's looming defeat. He also mentioned the mistreatment sometimes meted out in the Hitler Youth. [1]

In the fall of 1941, Hübener enlisted the help of fellow Latter-day Saints, Karl-Heinz Schnibbe and Ruddi Wobbe, and later Gerhard Duwer. They helped to distribute about 60 different pamphlets. On 5 February 1942, Helmuth Hübener was arrested by the Gestapo. On 11 August 1942, Hübener's case was tried at the Volksgerichtshof in Berlin, and on 27 October, at the age of 17, he was beheaded by guillotine at Plötzensee Prison in Berlin. His two friends, Schnibbe and Wobbe, who had also been arrested, were given prison sentences of five and ten years respectively.

The court decide to punish Hübener as an adult, because of his mature and sharp intellect. He was executed only seven hours after being told of his sentence. His lawyers and family had pleaded for life imprisonment instead of death for him. Since he was tried as an adult and an enemy of the State, he was subject to torture and difficult living conditions in prison.

Excommunication from the Church is often meted out to criminals, and after the sentence was revealed, local church authorities excommunicated Helmuth. As soon as the news reached church headquarters in Salt Lake City, however, church leaders immediately reinstated him into full church fellowship. Local leaders had not followed church policy, it was determined. The day of his execution he wrote to the fellow branch member, "I know that God lives and He will be the Just Judge in this matter ... I look forward to seeing you in a better world!" (Hübener at Dixie State College". 2005-03-14.) [2]

A youth centre and a pathway in Hamburg are now named for Helmuth Hübener. At the former Plötzensee Prison in Berlin, an exhibit about young Helmuth Hübener's resistance, trial, and execution is located in the former guillotine chamber, where floral tributes are often placed in memory of Hübener and others put to death by the Nazis there.

Hübener's story has been the subject of various literary, dramatic, and cinematic works. In 1969, German author Günter Grass wrote the book Örtlich betäubt ("Local anesthetic"), later translated into English, about the Hübener group. In 1979 Brigham Young University professor Thomas Rogers wrote a play titled Huebener, which has had several runs in various venues. Schnibbe, one of Hübener's co-accused, attended some of the performances on the BYU campus. Rudi Wobbe, another co-accused, attended one. Wobbe later died of cancer in 1992.

Schnibbe wrote the first-hand account When Truth Was Treason. The book Hübener vs. Hitler; A Biography of Helmuth Hübener, Mormon Teenage Resistance Leader, by Richard Lloyd Dewey was published in 2003; upon selling out the first edition, a second, revised edition with new material and corrections was released in late 2004.

Rudolf Wobbe (Hübener's other co-resistance fighter) wrote the book Before the Blood Tribunal. Published in 1989, the book provides a personal account of his own trial before the Volksgerichtshof, the infamous "people's court" of Nazi Germany. Rudi, as he was known, was charged with Conspiracy to Commit High Treason and Aiding and Abetting the Enemy. Chief Justice Fikeis sentenced him to 10 years for his participation in the resistance. The account also describes events leading up to the trials of the three German youths and Rudi's own experience as a prisoner. [3]

The 2008 juvenile novel The Boy Who Dared by Susan Campbell Bartoletti, while fictional, is based on Hübener's life. Bartoletti's earlier Newbery Honor book, Hitler Youth: Growing Up in Hitler's Shadow (2005), also covers Hübener's story. Hübener's story was documented in the 2003 movie Truth & Conviction, written and directed by Rick McFarland and Matt Whitaker. The movie, later released on DVD, was sponsored by the BYU College of Humanities. Truth & Treason A major motion picture based on the Hübener Group is currently being produced by Russ Kendall, Micah Merrill & Matt Whitaker of Kaleidoscope Pictures. Whitaker will also direct the film.


Christian Science under Hitler

  Table of Contents



Newspaper Comment on Nazi Edict Against Christian Science

[PAID ARTICLE] Christian Science in Nazi Germany by William Stillman

Nazis Hit Christian Science for Refuting Race Doctrine

Nazi Party Condemns Christian Science As Non-German, Liberal and Pacifist Sect

Time Religion: Nazi Ban on Christian Science

Lady Astor, Christian Science, Hitler and Danville, Virginia Mark Tooley

Thankfulness during Nazi wartime struggles Christian Science

Nazi opposer raised Christian Scientist

OUR JEWISH BRETHREN: CHRISTIAN SCIENCE RESPONSES TO KRISTALLNACHT

Christian Scientist Charles Gratke reports on the rise of Hitler

Christian Scientist Charles Gratke reports on the rise of Hitler




 https://www.marybakereddylibrary.org/research/from-the-collections-charles-gratke-reports-on-the-rise-of-hitler/

From the Collections: Charles Gratke reports

on the rise of Hitler

November 26, 2019

Daily morning news conference of The Christian Science Monitor editorial staff, circa 1945-1949. Left to Right: Saville Davis (American News Editor), Donovan Richardson (Chief Editorial Writer), Charles Gratke (Foreign News Editor), Edward Mills (City Editor), Erwin D. Canham (Editor), Paul Deland (Managing Editor), and Harry Hazeldine (Head of the Copy Desk). P08940. Unknown photographer. Courtesy The Mary Baker Eddy Library.


Our collections offer insights into the work of reporters for The Christian Science Monitor. Archival accounts from the newspaper’s staff portray a compelling incident involving correspondent Charles Edward Gratke (1901–1949). It took place in 1933, during the time of Adolph Hitler’s rise to power.


Gratke joined the Monitor staff in 1927, around the time he became a member of The First Church of Christ, Scientist (The Mother Church). He had begun his reporting career in Astoria, Oregon, on his father’s newspaper, the Evening Budget. He worked in the Monitor’s New York bureau and in various other capacities, before taking over the duties of Berlin staff correspondent.1


During his time in Berlin, Gratke wrote several insightful articles on interwar Germany. He reported on a variety of topics, including how the Treaty of Versailles impacted the German economy, the state takeover of the German steel trust, and President Paul Von Hindenburg’s rejection of Adolf Hitler as Chancellor in August 1932.2 Gratke interviewed Hitler in December 1931. Hitler then claimed that Germany’s economic problems, which were well documented, could be attributed to the weakness of the German government. According to Hitler, the fact that other countries did not “respect” Germany meant that it would be at a disadvantage in negotiations with other nations. Closing the article, Gratke directed the reader’s attention to the divisions of opinion surrounding Hitler, suggesting that his ambitions held ominous implications:


The last question pertained to [Hitler’s] attitude toward Parliament. “Whether I would govern with a Parliament depends on the Parliament,” he said, rising from his chair. A quick clap of the hand, and a short bow, and the man of whom millions of Germans expect a new ascent of their nation, and in whom other millions foresee disaster, left the room.3


While this interview may have been one of his most noteworthy reports from Germany, Gratke also wrote a series of articles about the challenges facing average citizens. Appearing under the title “Diary of an Onlooker in Germany,” they explained the different political philosophies competing for dominance, the role of tariffs, and the impact of war reparations on the German economy. Illustrating the connections between the government’s position and the citizen’s experience, he interviewed “Hans,” whom he described as invisible but ubiquitous:


“And suppose,” [Hans] continues, “you demand 1,000,000 marks. I cannot pay. Suppose you demand 100,000 marks. I cannot pay. Even if we negotiate and agree on 50,000 marks, still I cannot.”… [T]he definiteness with which Hans has come to regard his incapacity to pay has provided the Government with the backing to demand complete cancellation of reparations.4


Gratke’s efforts to provide accurate on-the-ground reporting in Germany took him to a March 2, 1933, rally at Berlin’s Sportpalast in Potsdamer Straße (today’s Potsdamer Platz), to hear Hitler speak about the problems of the national government. The speech was scheduled to be broadcast throughout Germany.5 He attended the rally with John Emlyn Williams, the Monitor’s Bureau Chief for Berlin,6 and two other colleagues. During Hitler’s speech, Nazi Brownshirts (part of Hitler’s Sturmabteilung, or “storm unit”) attacked and beat Williams and Gratke. Williams described the experience in a letter to John S. Braithwaite, the European managing editor for The Christian Science Publishing Society:


Immediately after Hitler had spoken, while he was being cheered down the main aisle, I got up with the rest of the people [and] followed the rest of my neighbours in climbing on a chair to have a peep at him. Most of them had their hands up in the Nazi salute others were shouting “Heil Hitler” and similar things. I did not put my hand up. Then suddenly up came a youngster of about 18 years, hit me across the nose, at the same time saying, “Why don’t you put up your hands?” and a lot of similar stuff, and told me to get out. At the same time, some more uniformed Nazis appeared and dragged me to the side aisle, and then carried me out, administering kicks and hits on the way. After a great deal of this kind of thing, a Nazi who spoke English imperfectly was found who took me away in a corner. There we waited until the crowd subsided a little, and he told me “to be off home out of it.”… I may also add that the police just looked on while all this was going on, and one of them to whom I tried to show a police credential, in the course of being rushed out, just turned aside and ignored it.7


The subsequent characterization of this attack and various attributions of responsibility reveal the challenges the Monitor faced during the rise of Nazism during the 1930s. In an initial letter to Braithwaite, Alfred Bode, the newspaper’s German Advertising Manager, believed that the Monitor staffers bore responsibility for the situation:


It has been indisputably ascertained that the demeanour of Mr. Gratke had been provoking and that he had got his beating and was kicked out only in consequences of these provocations. It has also been ascertained that particulars of him have been recorded by the officials.8


Williams offered another interpretation:


The only incident I can think of is this, but it seems so absurd that I must laugh at it. During the course of Hitler’s speech, Gratke on one occasion asked me if I had understood what Hitler said as he had not been able to write it down. I said to G[ratke] that I had it in my head…. I touched the side of my head with my forefinger to indicate this the better. (According to what Ch[urchill] said afterwards this was taken by some Nazi uniformed people, who were watching from a stairway about thirty yards away, as a disparagement of the speaker—Hitler).9


This incident took place against a rising tide of anti-internationalism in Germany. Bode argued that Gratke had failed to consider the sentiments of the German people in his articles; that, in combination with his demeanor at the Sportpalast, was the reason he was attacked. He went on to blame Gratke’s Monitor coverage for the publication’s having been placed on a list of newspapers hostile to the German government.10 Williams wrote that such sentiments were representative of the political climate in Germany at the time:


I am forced to the conclusion that it is almost impossible at the present moment to get many of those who “ought to know better” to see anything that happens here except under the influence of the “revolution of national uplift.”11


Braithwaite reviewed the letters he received and responded to Bode on April 24, 1933. While he acknowledged that it may have been unwise for Gratke to attend the rally in the first place, he defended him:


[Gratke] is the one who is attacked, and he is the one who needs our help and support at this time, for however mistaken his actions may have been, they have been done in good faith, and he is [a] loyal Christian Scientist.12


The discussion in these archival documents surrounding the March 2 attack on Gratke and Williams reveals some of the perils Monitor reporters faced in trying to bring truth to their reporting. It also suggests the paths the participants would subsequently take. Bode was dismissed from his post with the Monitor in 1935, and in 1936 he denounced both the newspaper and The Mother Church for the Nazi periodical Der Judenkenner, claiming that the church was involved in a Jewish-Masonic conspiracy.13 Gratke was relocated to London and then returned to Boston, where he served the Monitor as General News Editor and then Foreign News Editor.14 He received the Medaille de la Reconnaissance Française for his work in organizing news out of France during the Nazi occupation. He also won the annual award of Sigma Delta Chi for his survey of Germany under occupation in 1946.15 Gratke remained with the Monitor until July 12,1949, when he was one of 13 American news reporters killed in a Royal Dutch Airlines crash in Bombay, India.16


Throughout his career with the Monitor, Gratke showed appreciation for its mission. In an article for the Christian Science Sentinel, he pointed out that Mary Baker Eddy had not intended for the Monitor to be “just another newspaper.” It was not enough to merely “record” the news; instead, he referenced the Monitor’s coverage of the German invasion of Yugoslavia and Greece, which had begun on April 6, 1941:


And the human news certainly was not encouraging. Yet what appeared most important, after that day was over, was not the fact that we had achieved a fairly lucid and balanced account of what was happening. Nor was it that we were saved from the pitfalls of overstatement and sensationalism. It was rather an article which appeared in the Monitor…. “There is always a danger lest in times of stress thought should become so concentrated on the pressure of immediate circumstances as to render the whole picture of events completely out of focus…. Truth alone restores all things to their proper perspective.”17


Bode – Braithwaite letter 

Use the slider to see page letters and click on each one to see them larger. 



Page 1

SEE LARGER

12345678910

Subscribe to our podcast



Listen on Spotify


Questions?

Do you have questions or comments for The Mary Baker Eddy Library?


CONTACT US


Article categories

Ask a researcher

Authentications

Featured Articles

From the Collections

From the Mary Baker Eddy Papers

Women of History

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

”Charles Edward Gratke,” undated, Church Archives, Box 20228, Folder 121887.

Charles E. Gratke, “Reich Erects Sign on Road to Recovery,” The Christian Science Monitor, 10 June 1932, 1; Gratke, “German Golden Relief Chain Grows Long and Burdensome,” Monitor, 27 June1932, 1; Gratke, “Hindenburg’s Emphatic ‘No’ Blocks Hitler,” Monitor, 15 August 1932, 1.

“Hitler Defends Strong Reich As Basis of French Accord,” Monitor, 22 December 1931, 1. While Gratke’s name does not accompany the article, Erwin Canham attributes the article to Gratke in Commitment to Freedom: The Story of The Christian Science Monitor, (Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1958), 291, 446.

Gratke, “Diary of an Onlooker in Germany,” Monitor, 18 July 1932, 18.

Alfred Bode to John S. Braithwaite, 5 April 1933, Church Archives, Box 20241, Folder 119875.

Elaine Follis, “Weapons of Our Warfare: Christian Science in the Third Reich,” 2001, The First Church of Christ, Scientist, Boston, Archives, Box 540637, Folder 201455674, 55.

J. Emlyn Williams to J.S. Braithwaite, 5 April 1933, Church Archives, Box 20241, Folder 119875.

Alfred Bode to John S. Braithwaite, 5 April 1933, Church Archives, Box 20241, Folder 119875.

Williams to Braithwaite, 5 April 1933, Church Archives, Box 20241, Folder 119875.

Bode to Braithwaite, 5 April 1933, Church Archives, Box 20241, Folder 119875.

Williams to Braithwaite, 5 April 1933, Church Archives, Box 20241, Folder 119875.

Braithwaite to Bode, 24 April 1933, Church Archives, Box 20241, Folder 119875.

Elaine Follis, “Weapons of Our Warfare: Christian Science in the Third Reich,” 2001, The First Church of Christ, Scientist, Boston, Archives, Box 540637, Folder 201455674, 46, 78.

”Charles Edward Gratke,” undated, Church Archives, Box 20228, Folder 121887.

“Careers of Dead in India Air Crash,” The New York Times, 13 July 1949, 3.

“13 American Newsmen Killed When Plane Crashes in India,” The Christian Science Monitor, 12 July 1949, 1.

Charles E. Gratke, “The Christian Science Monitor News,” Christian Science Sentinel, 12 July 1941, 904.

Hitler and the Trinity - Table of Contents

Anti-trinitarianism in Nazi Germany in regards to the anti-trinitarian movements of Positive Christianity, Freemasonry, Theosophy and the Fr...